Nov 29, 2011
tonight i do not have time ........but i want to discuss some important matter in order to clarify and GEREH GOSHAii
but the person who talked of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat was rather silly was he not.??
on the other extreme we would have the Dictatorship of the bosses !! well that does not sound very good either.
First it is that word DICTATORSHIP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
i want to talk about KERRY when he was running for President. He said point blank :
We cannot be FOR JOBS , if we are against JOB CREATORS .......sure that made sense
and so JOB Seekers must not be against JOB Creators !!
the Difference between DICTATORSHIP and DEMOCRACY lies in an understanding between the employer and the employee.
I want also to give a real life example to decide about this issue .
Let me tell you about hearing of a company who had hit hard times . The boss said to the employees that times are tough , and we cannot continue as before . I have to either reduce employees , or we could ask everyone to work instead of 5 days a week , only 3 . or 30 hours instead of 40 hours.
One employee said , i will go elsewhere because i cannot do with the pay for only 3 days , i need full time.
But the others decided to accept and do as the employer BOSS said. so that all would still have a job.
Does that sound reasonable or not ?
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Friday, November 25, 2011
WRONG DIRECTION ?!
Nov 25, 2011
The Pollsters or (Pollocrats ) often ask People about the Direction of the Country
( they call it wrong track or right track ) and announce that a majority say the country is going in the wrong direction.
Right now, it is about 73 %.
No wonder really , since the Political gridlock and the Economic Anxiety have taken a toll on the proverbial American OPTIMISM .
That is in a great party to the CONSTANT propaganda of the Deficit Hawks who have shown (correctly ) the amount of DEBT America has. Plus the constant criticism and bashing of OBAMA by the TEAbaggers and GOPers.
I have a different INTERPRETATION of the POLL numbers on that subject.
REFER you to my other blogs www.pollocracy.blogspot.com
and www.USDebtNOMore.blogspot.com
The Pollsters or (Pollocrats ) often ask People about the Direction of the Country
( they call it wrong track or right track ) and announce that a majority say the country is going in the wrong direction.
Right now, it is about 73 %.
No wonder really , since the Political gridlock and the Economic Anxiety have taken a toll on the proverbial American OPTIMISM .
That is in a great party to the CONSTANT propaganda of the Deficit Hawks who have shown (correctly ) the amount of DEBT America has. Plus the constant criticism and bashing of OBAMA by the TEAbaggers and GOPers.
I have a different INTERPRETATION of the POLL numbers on that subject.
REFER you to my other blogs www.pollocracy.blogspot.com
and www.USDebtNOMore.blogspot.com
GRIDLOCK is not the solution
Nov 25, 2011
I think it was before the 2008 Election that I wrote here something like this :
America has many problems and needs to solve them. So, I hope that the Democratic Party can win a substantial VETO proof Majority in order to be able to solve them.
Well, Little did I know that there was such a thing as FILIBUSTER and that the Democratic Party had so many Blue Dogs voting with the GOPers.
So even that MAGICAL 60 Vote Majority would be just a number , and not translate into votes.
The Filibuster makes each senator a DICTATOR who could force his/her will and stop all reasonable solutions .
I remember even the Late Daniel SCHORR naming this STUBBORN REPUBLICAN OPPOSITION ................the TYRANNY of the MINORITY.
The determination of the GOPers to PREVENT Obama to accomplish anything really effective and the intention to make him a ONE TERM President was OBVIOUS to all.
This is why it was amazing for me to see how the Professional LEFT did not take that Opposition into account and blame Obama for everything.
That was not only UNFAIR but STUPID and politically IGNORANT.
Unfortunately, we saw how the MID TERM election gave the House back to the Republican Party with their TEAbagger footsoldiers coming out to vote with Enthousiasm , while the DEMS went MIA on NOV 2, 2010.
Now we really have GRIDLOCK .
This Political griodlock and the ECONOMIC Anxiety has demoralized the American People so much that 73 % think the country is going in the wrong direction .
I think it was before the 2008 Election that I wrote here something like this :
America has many problems and needs to solve them. So, I hope that the Democratic Party can win a substantial VETO proof Majority in order to be able to solve them.
Well, Little did I know that there was such a thing as FILIBUSTER and that the Democratic Party had so many Blue Dogs voting with the GOPers.
So even that MAGICAL 60 Vote Majority would be just a number , and not translate into votes.
The Filibuster makes each senator a DICTATOR who could force his/her will and stop all reasonable solutions .
I remember even the Late Daniel SCHORR naming this STUBBORN REPUBLICAN OPPOSITION ................the TYRANNY of the MINORITY.
The determination of the GOPers to PREVENT Obama to accomplish anything really effective and the intention to make him a ONE TERM President was OBVIOUS to all.
This is why it was amazing for me to see how the Professional LEFT did not take that Opposition into account and blame Obama for everything.
That was not only UNFAIR but STUPID and politically IGNORANT.
Unfortunately, we saw how the MID TERM election gave the House back to the Republican Party with their TEAbagger footsoldiers coming out to vote with Enthousiasm , while the DEMS went MIA on NOV 2, 2010.
Now we really have GRIDLOCK .
This Political griodlock and the ECONOMIC Anxiety has demoralized the American People so much that 73 % think the country is going in the wrong direction .
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
ZUCCOTTI Park
Nov 15, 2011
Well , I had suggested about 2 weeks ago that the general assembly should consider cutting the hours or doing it in shifts .
And Obviously , if occupation would be 24/7 the TENTS would be necessary.
So , now, the Mayor forced this.
One line of Mayor Bloomberg said that the Occupiers would not instead of using the power of their presence, would have to ...power of their argument.
and that was good
Nov 17 there is an event apparently.
Well , I had suggested about 2 weeks ago that the general assembly should consider cutting the hours or doing it in shifts .
And Obviously , if occupation would be 24/7 the TENTS would be necessary.
So , now, the Mayor forced this.
One line of Mayor Bloomberg said that the Occupiers would not instead of using the power of their presence, would have to ...power of their argument.
and that was good
Nov 17 there is an event apparently.
PEOPLE as opposed to PERSON
Nov 15 , 2011
A few days ago, I made a comment on HuffingtonPost .
It had to do with the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling.
Suddenly, I realized something. I have to ask someone who is an expert ie more knowledgeable than me if the DISTINCTION i noticed is correct or not on the particular subject of FREEDOM of SPEECH as mentionned in the Constitution 14th ammendment.
Here is what I noticed : Freedom of speech being granted to individual citizens , and why the saying MONEY is SPEECH has to be applied to INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS ie PERSONs
So ONE PERSON can use MONEY as SPEECH................and give $$$$$ to a politician.
BUT
corporations may be PEOPLE ( many persons ) so, since the people in corporations are not asked if they want to give money $$$$$$ then that rule of MONEY is SPEECH cannot apply to the CORPORATION ( people as SHAREHOLDERS ).
Now, if some right wingers object to this, i will respectfully remind them that HOW COME that you OBJECT to the UNIONS ...........giving contributions to politicians because you say WORKERS may not want to..............contribute to that or this politicians.
JUST as I say that PEOPLE in CORPORATIONS may definitely be against wanting the company give $$$$ because really all this giving /contributions will be charged
A few days ago, I made a comment on HuffingtonPost .
It had to do with the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling.
Suddenly, I realized something. I have to ask someone who is an expert ie more knowledgeable than me if the DISTINCTION i noticed is correct or not on the particular subject of FREEDOM of SPEECH as mentionned in the Constitution 14th ammendment.
Here is what I noticed : Freedom of speech being granted to individual citizens , and why the saying MONEY is SPEECH has to be applied to INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS ie PERSONs
So ONE PERSON can use MONEY as SPEECH................and give $$$$$ to a politician.
BUT
corporations may be PEOPLE ( many persons ) so, since the people in corporations are not asked if they want to give money $$$$$$ then that rule of MONEY is SPEECH cannot apply to the CORPORATION ( people as SHAREHOLDERS ).
Now, if some right wingers object to this, i will respectfully remind them that HOW COME that you OBJECT to the UNIONS ...........giving contributions to politicians because you say WORKERS may not want to..............contribute to that or this politicians.
JUST as I say that PEOPLE in CORPORATIONS may definitely be against wanting the company give $$$$ because really all this giving /contributions will be charged
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)